Adding tyrosine kinase inhibitors to chemo may upgrade AML with BCR::ABL1 from high-risk to intermediate-risk.
AML harboring BCR::ABL1 is classified as adverse-risk by European LeukemiaNet guidelines, but this classification was established before TKIs were routinely added to treatment. This real-world study of 57 BCR::ABL1 AML patients from the Spanish PETHEMA registry assessed whether TKI addition changes…
Adding tyrosine kinase inhibitors to chemo may upgrade AML with BCR::ABL1 from high-risk to intermediate-risk.
AML harboring BCR::ABL1 is classified as adverse-risk by European LeukemiaNet guidelines, but this classification was established before TKIs were routinely added to treatment. This real-world study of 57 BCR::ABL1 AML patients from the Spanish PETHEMA registry assessed whether TKI addition changes prognosis.
Patients who received TKI had better relapse-free survival (median not reached vs. 7.6 months without TKI, p=0.029). Comparison with the broader PETHEMA cohort showed TKI-treated BCR::ABL1 AML patients had OS similar to intermediate-risk patients—not adverse-risk. No independent prognostic factors were identified in Cox regression.
Though based on small numbers, this supports re-classification of BCR::ABL1 AML to intermediate-risk when TKI is used, which has treatment planning implications.
Key Findings
- TKI addition improved relapse-free survival (median not reached vs. 7.6 months without TKI, p=0.029)
- TKI-treated BCR::ABL1 AML had OS similar to intermediate-risk patients in PETHEMA cohort
- 57 patients with BCR::ABL1 AML from Spanish registry
- Current adverse-risk classification may be outdated in the TKI era
- Results support re-classification to intermediate-risk, though larger studies are needed
Implications
BCR::ABL1 AML patients receiving TKI may warrant reclassification to intermediate-risk, potentially affecting clinical trial enrollment criteria, treatment intensity decisions, and transplant indications. TKI should be added to treatment for all BCR::ABL1 AML patients.
Caveats
Small retrospective study (n=57, only 15 received TKI); abstract-only. Selection bias likely in TKI receipt. Single country (Spain). Larger prospective studies are needed before guideline changes. Overall survival did not reach statistical significance (p=0.28).
Source: Cancer — 2026-04-15